6 hours ago
Aiming to glorify God and enjoy Him and His good gifts together
"I hear many say that they are going to do something in order to 'please God.' But, here is something to consider: there is NOTHING that we can do to please God! Christians are justified based on the merit of Christ and Christ alone. Therefore, true Christians that are being sanctified by the Spirit live a life of obedience as a result of having been justified and not as a means to please God or justify themselves. So, if I make a decision to live my life in a hard area, that decision does not make God any more pleased with me. However, I can GLORIFY God more in certain decisions than others.How liberating it is to realize that I do not and cannot do anything to please God. He has done it all! My righteous living (glorifying God) will inevitably result from my relationship with him. If I know Christ and his resurrection I WILL live a godly life (cf. Mt. 7:17; Jn. 14:15; 15:4-16).
The Christian can make decisions that show God as more glorious than other decisions. If I make a decision to live in a hard area, I may say that God could be more glorified in my life by that than if I had chosen to live the easy life. God is not more pleased with me because of that decision (for nothing can make God more pleased with me than Christ Himself). To even imply that God could be more pleased with me because of an action I take spits in the face of justification by faith alone. However, some Christians may glorify God more than others by pursuing God in hard ways and laying down more of their life as a result of having more joy in God. God is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in him. Therefore, since Christians have differing levels of joy, some Christians may glorify God more than others. But, all Christians are EQUALLY pleasing to God because all Christians are justified by faith alone through Christ alone."
At LIFE group a couple of weeks ago I saw a book by Hank Hanegraaff entitled 'The Apocalypse Code'. I had been hearing about it on his radio show (The Bible Answer Man) and was very intrigued. From what I had heard it sounded like this was a treatment of eschatology (study of the end times) that was completely different from what I had been taught all of my life."Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so" (Acts. 17:11 ESV).
The 'Apocalypse Code' is basically a defense of partial preterism (Latin praeter, meaning "past"). A preterist believes that most end-time prophecy was fulfilled in A.D. 70 with the destruction of Jerusalem and the Jewish temple. An aberrant view of preterism, called full or consistent preterism, believes that ALL prophecy was fulfilled including Jesus' 2nd-coming. This book does not subscribe to the latter view.L - Literal PrincipleOne of the most compelling arguments that the book makes is for an earlier dating of the New Testament (NT) than what we had previously thought or had been told. I'm convinced that the book of Revelation must have been written prior to A.D. 70 if for no other reason than the Apostle John doesn't mention the destruction of the temple at all (or any of the other NT books for that matter). How can the most important thing in Jewish life, the center of their 'universe' both sociologically and theologically, not be mentioned anywhere unless the writings preceded the event?! And if the cataclysm of A.D. 70 hadn't occurred, then it's highly probable that most, if not all, of the allusions to judgment and the apocalypse, especially in Revelation, would be a reference to the impending destruction of Jerusalem. It also follows, logically, that the canon would have been completed before the destruction of Jerusalem as God's way of preserving and disseminating his word due to the dispersion of true Israel (diaspora).
I - Illumination Principle (exegesis)
G - Grammatical Principle
H - Historical Princple
T - Typology Principle
S - Scriptural Synergy (harmony)
I just finished reading a book called "Protecting the Gift" by Gavin De Becker. It's about keeping your kids safe from predators. Mr. De Becker has an obvious evolutionary worldview, and if you can get past all his talk comparing people to animals, I would recommend this book for parents. He advocates being aware of warning signs about people, and also listening to that still small instinctive voice (God-given, not evolved) that we sometimes discount because it seems irrational. He also gives great advice to women about how to avoid becoming a victim of violence. This is especially timely given the horrible news about Kelsey Smith's abduction and murder. For those of you who haven't heard, Kelsey was an 18 year-old girl, who just graduated high school, who was abducted in neighboring Overland Park on Saturday. She was leaving Target when a man abducted her in broad daylight. De Becker's book reminded me that you always want to fight for your life before you are taken to a secondary location; even if you are injured in the fight, it's likely better than what will happen to you if you are taken to a more private location. Sorry to be a downer today, but thinking about these awful possibilities and preparing for them is better than burying your head in the sand and being unable to protect yourself from people with evil intentions...